Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
The prosecution and punishment of accused criminals in the city
Explanation:
The prosecution and punishment of accused criminals in the city
Answer:
initial appearance
Explanation:
In the United States, the states that do not utilize preliminary hearings schedule an arraignment date at the initial appearance.
brainliest? :)
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This person that is called on to testify during a trial must have the knowledge or skills in the field that is relevant to the case. A psychologist may be asked to serve as a consultant to an attorney or to a testifying psychologist. This can be used to determine if someone is being truthful or if they are being deceitful. They can be appointed by the court and they can sort through claims that are conflicting or if a conclusion cannot be reached. He is there to express his opinion based on his knowledge and education.
