Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Hello</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>there</em><em>!</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>
<em>The</em><em> </em><em>answer is option</em><em> </em><em>D</em><em>.</em>
<em>I</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>given</em><em> </em><em>solution</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>picture</em><em>.</em>
<em>Hope it helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<span>450/100=x/145. Cross multiply to get 100x=65250. Divide by 100 to get 652.50. The selling price of the painting is $652.50. Brainlest?</span>
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.