B. it was the origin site of the 2 religious.
Answer:
The power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces, and to establish a Post Office.
From the options, I find two that are potentially good, as the other ones actually include small inconsistencies which make them false: (e.g. the islands surrouding Ithaka lie not only to south and east
Dulichium, Same, and Zacynthus are all visible to Ithaca
Odysseus holds his home very close to his heart.
Of these two the more relevant is the following, and I think it's also the correct option:
Odysseus holds his home very close to his heart.
it provides an argument why he things that it's a good place to grow up
Religious minorities were treated as second-rate beings by the Ottoman and Safavid empires. The Janissary system used Christians as the Sultan's bodyguards. The rivalry between Sunni and Shia Muslims was related to who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad.
<h3>What was the Janissary system?</h3>
- It was a system formed by several armies.
- It was the system formed by the elite army of the Ottoman sultans.
- It was the army used to fight Christians.
- This system led Christians who refused to convert to Islam as the sultan's slaves and bodyguards.
In the Ottoman and Safavid empires, religious minorities were seen as unfit for society. The sultans of these empires forced the people of the conquered areas to adopt the sultan's religion, Islam. Those who refused would be seen as inferior beings and therefore would be enslaved.
These empires witnessed disputes between Shia and Sunni Muslims. These disputes were based on the dispute over who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad. For the Shias, succession should take place within the descendants of the prophet, but for the Sunnis, the people should elect a successor.
Learn more about the Ottoman and Safavid empires:
brainly.com/question/26501400
#SPJ1
Answer: Dissenting Opinion
-----
Usually when decision is written, justices can write a concurring opinion if they would like to add something to the decision or if they agree with the decision, but disagrees with the reasoning. On the other hand, if they do not agree with the majority (aka the decision), they can write a dissenting opinion.
