Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
Answer: Individual differences.
Explanation:
Amber and Jules although they are close friends posses individual differences in behavior. Individual differences are those unique qualities an individual posseses that makes that person different from others: it could be temperament, intelligence, motivation, interest etc.
Answer:
(D) Sophie, who started a student support hot line for students in crisis
Explanation:
Although each of these students has interests, qualities, or knowledge that could be useful, Sophie’s social awareness and service orientation are skills that would help her succeed as a barber.
It united them in defense against the Crusaders.
Explanation:
- The original response of the Muslims to the Crusades was really pathetic.
- The symbolic caliph of Baghdad did not even try to gather Muslims in the fight for the liberation of the holy places.
- Many Seljuk emirs were too busy fighting each other.
- The Shi'a Fatimis in Egypt regularly made alliances with the Crusaders to hurt the Sunni Seljuks. Muslims were unable to resist the invasion.
- However, Muslims are slowly beginning to unite and oppose the Crusaders.
Learn more on Crusades on
brainly.com/question/8191125
brainly.com/question/4159680
#learnwithBrainly
