Answer:
The correct answer is: Brazil.
Explanation:
Goldman Sachs coins in 2001 the term BRIC to refer to those major economies that were likely the most influential of the 21st century. BRIC is an acronym that joins the initial for the countries of Brazil, Russia, India and, China. Out of the four, Brazil's Odebrecht-Petrobras case has been spread all over the world as one of the biggest corruption cases known in economic history, where governmental representatives and even president <em>Luis Inacio Lula da Silva was involved</em>. Besides, the uneven distribution of wealth in Brazil is an ongoing problem that has been affecting its population for decades.
Answer:
leading indicators
Explanation:
In the balance scorecard, the non-financial measures of performance could be done like customer satisfaction would able to anticipate the performance in the future as it can be an indicator in terms of the customer loyalty that can easily anticipate the revenue occur in the future
Hence, as per the given situation, this is a leading indicators
hence, the same is to be considered
Answer:
America is known as the land of opportunity, where one could achieve anything they put their mind to, no matter who they are. Thousands of people immigrate to the United States every year from different parts of the world to have access to these kinds of opportunities. This is what is known as "the American dream".
Explanation:
The answer is <u>"a. True".</u>
Preemptive multitasking refers to a task in which a PC operating system utilizes a few criteria to choose to what extent to allot to any one errand before giving another assignment a swing to utilize the working framework. The demonstration of taking control of the working framework starting with one errand and giving it then onto the next assignment is called preempting.
A typical basis for preempting is basically slipped by time (this sort of framework is now and again called time sharing or time cutting). In some operating systems, a few applications can be given higher need than different applications, giving the higher need programs control when they are started and maybe longer time slices.
Answer: No, because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply
Explanation:
According to the information given, the federal court cannot grant the partial summary judgment motion. The reason for this is because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, it's required for the federal court to give full faith and credit to the state court judgments. Therefore, in this scenario, if a subsequent action in the state is barred by the state-court judgment, then it can be deduced that it acts to bar a subsequent action in the federal court too.
