Answer: If the commercial is TRUE that every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, the marginal utility from consuming more of the advertised product must be CONSTANT. Option D.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction an individual gets, from consuming an additional unit of a product or service.
Therefore, in the scenario given above, if every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, then the additional satisfaction is just as good as the preceding satisfaction. We can therefore say that the marginal utility gotten from consuming that product is constant.
Given:
ΔY = $5,000, the change in income
ΔS = 50,000 - 54,000 = - 4,000, the change in savings.
By definition,
MPS (Marginal Propensity to Spend) is
MPS = ΔS/ΔY = -4000/5000 = -0.8
The relation between MPS and MPC (Marginal Propensity to Consume) is
MPS + MPC = 1.
Therefore
MPC - 0.8 = 1
MPC = 1.8
Answer:
MPS = 0.8
MPC = 1.8
Answer and explanation:
Externalized costs are costs that the society pays that are generated by producers and the consumers of the product. The common example is the use of petrol. If I own a car and I don't like riding bicyle for smaller distances, this means the Carbon dioxie emission caused due to me have to be born by the society. This means that the net effect would be a loss to society caused by the usage of products that are injurious to our ecosystem.
UK has targeted to achieve zero Carbon dioxide emission by 2050, which shows their commitment to social responsibility and we keep dumping things in the oceans because nobody acknowlegdes the damage caused by using plastic made products and also not recycling it. After plastic into the oceans the marine life suffers. The Carbon Dioxide emission is one of the main reasons why the glaciers are melting and many animals are dying annually. We unaware with our responsibilities to our society and love profits no matter if someone dies or get harmed by the operations of the company or using products that have greater externalized costs.
Answer:
The kind of corporate takeover technique implemented in the film is proxy fight.
Explanation:
A proxy fight is termed as a technique where two corporate factions ask the stakeholders for the proxy votes such that the right of voting is transferred.
In this case both the parties, the heiress as well as the opponent is asking for the right of vote from stakeholders so that they can decide the corporate future. This is the key feature of the proxy fight and thus this is the correct option.
Where did the answer go after I signed up? I sign up and the answer disapperas?
