I believe the answer is: The District Attorney's case was a criminal case; Jane's lawsuit was a civil case.
A case is considered to be a criminal case if the government is the one that sue the defendant for the things that the defendant did in the past. A case would be considered as a civil case if both the person who sue and the defendant are blonged to the citizens group.
<span>I believe the correct answer is: Concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is the term used in law that refers to an opinion written by judge/judges of court which agrees with the majority, but outlines additional considerations (different reasons) he or she thinks are important.
Even though Concurring opinions can’t change the final decision, but can serve as a persuasive argument for lawyers, in many legal systems these opinions are not reported as the court "speaks with one voice".</span>
The North continued to grow, but so did the tensions between Northern abolitionists and Southern slaveholders
Answer:
In case of the death, impeachment, resignation, removal from office, or other disability of the governor, the powers and duties of the office for the residue of the term, or until he shall be acquitted, or the disability removed, shall devolve upon the lieutenant governor.
Explanation:
did some research . hope this helps :)
The answer to this quesition is <span>the confirmation bias
</span><span>the confirmation bias refers to people's tendency to seek confirmation regarding their exisiting belief by surrounding themselves with others with same opinion.
</span>This make those people basing their subjective opinion to interpret a certain situation.