All categories

2 years ago

If the area of the rectangle is 90 km?, then what is the value of the missing side?

Mathematics

2 answers:

r-ruslan [8.4K]2 years ago

5 0

I believe it would be B.
Logically, it’s the only one that makes sense,
As 9x10= 90
None of the others have any way to divide or multiply up to the area,
So yes, B.

Tems11 [23]2 years ago

5 0

It would be answer B) 10 km 15km hope helps did before

You might be interested in

The manufacturer of an energy drink spends $1.20 to make each drink and sells them for two dollars the manufacturer also has fix

dimulka [17.4K]

Let X be the number of energy drinks sold.

The manufacturer of an energy drink spends $1.20 to make each drink and sells them for two dollars the manufacturer also has fixed cost each month of $8000.

The manufacturing cost for X energy drinks is

$1.20x$

Fixed cost is $8000.

Therefore, cost function is

$C(x)=1.20x+8000$

Selling price of each drink is $2.

Therefore, the revenue function is

$R(x)=2x$

Hence, the revenue function is

$R(x)=2x$

6 0

10 months ago

Experian would like to test the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average

aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

a. We fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

b. The 95% confidence interval for the true difference of means is -2.2468 and 36.2468. There is a probability of 95% that the true difference of means $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is between -2.2468 and 36.2468. This confidence interval contains the number 0, this is consistent with the results we got in a. Because we fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ be the true difference between the average credit score for an adult in Virginia and the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina. We have the large sample sizes $n_{1} = 40$ and $n_{2} = 35$ , the unbiased point estimate for $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is $\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}$ , i.e., 699-682 = 17.

The standard error is given by $\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^{2}_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}_{2}}{n_{2}}}$ , i.e.,

$\sqrt{\frac{(44)^{2}}{40}+\frac{(41)^{2}}{35}}$ = 9.8198.

a. We want to test $H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} = 0$ vs $H_{1}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} \neq 0$ (two-tailed alternative). The rejection region is given by RR = {z | z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where -1.96 and 1.96 are the 2.5th and 97.5th quantiles of the standard normal distribution respectively. The test statistic is $Z = \frac{\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}-0}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^{2}_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ and the observed value is $z_{0} = \frac{17}{9.8198} = 1.7312$ . Because 1.7312 does not fall inside RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

b. The endpoints for a 95% confidence interval for $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is given by $17\pm (z_{0.05/2})9.8198$ , i.e., $17\pm (z_{0.025})9.8198$ where $z_{0.025}$ is the 2.5th quantile of the standard normal distribution, i.e., -1.96, so, we have 17-(1.96)(9.8198) and 17+(1.96)(9.8198), i.e., -2.2468 and 36.2468. There is a probability of 95% that the true difference of means $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is between -2.2468 and 36.2468. This confidence interval contains the number 0, this is consistent with the results we got in a. Because we fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

3 0

3 years ago

A stack of one hundred fifty cards is placed next to a ruler, and the height of the stack is measured to be 5/8 inches.

DaniilM [7]

Divide 5/8 by 150, to see how thick each is, that'll give you 150 even pieces that add up to 5/8

$\bf \cfrac{\frac{5}{8}}{150}\implies \cfrac{\frac{5}{8}}{\frac{150}{1}}\implies \cfrac{5}{8}\cdot \cfrac{1}{150}\implies \cfrac{1}{8\cdot 30}\implies \cfrac{1}{240}$

5 0

2 years ago

In 2010, the population of a town was 8500. The population decreased by 4.5% each year.

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

This is a problem in exponential decay.

a) If a town's population decreases by 4.5% every year that also means that the town's population decreases by a factor of .955 each year. (1 - .045 = .955)

So, after 5 years, the town's population is:

8,500 * .955^5 which equals 6,752.

So, basically, after t years, the town's population equals

8,500 * .955^t where t is the number of years that have passed since the year 2010.

b) population = 8,500 * .955 ^ (number of years since 2010)

7,000 / 8,500 = .955 ^ (number of years since 2010)

0.8235294118 = .955 ^ (number of years since 2010)

To solve for (number of years since 2010) we take logs of both sides

log (0.8235294118 ) = number of years since 2010 * log(.955)

-0.0843208857 = number of years since 2010 * -0.0199966284

-0.0843208857 / -0.0199966284 = number of years since 2010

4.2167551422 = number of years since 2010

So, population = 7,000 when the year is 2014.2167551422

Or about 2.6 months into 2014

(YES, it's just that "easy") LOL

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

May I please receive help?

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

9.2 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The shape is a triangle, the 11 ft is your hypotenuse

You need to use the Pythagorean Theorem!

a^2 + b^2 = c^2 (solve for a, the missing length that they ask for)

so --->

a^2 + (6^2) = 11^2

a^2 + 36 = 121

~subtract 36 to the right side~

a^2 = 85

now find the square root of 85:

a = 9.21954

round it to the nearest tenth:

a = 9.2

final answer: 9.2 ft

hope this helpsss

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers