It seems like the details of what p and q <em>are </em>in this context aren't all that important; it's the logical structure of the statement "p⇒q" we need to look at. We read that logical statement as "p implies q," where p is our <em>hypothesis</em> and q is our <em>conclusion</em>. When we take the converse of a logical statement, we reverse the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, <em>p </em>wouldn't imply <em>q</em>, but <em>q </em>would imply <em>p</em> in the converse of p⇒q. We'd write this statement as:
q⇒p
You can factor out 36*5=180 and 27*4=108 and find that they have 36 as greatest common divisor. The x and y factors have xy as the best you can divide by. So the factor becomes 36xy
36xy(5y²+3) = 36x5y³ + 27x4y
Answer:
Explanation:
A. The minimum possible length of the rug is 1.
B. The maximum area of the rug is 2m^2
Answer:
r=-6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
27 days
Step-by-step explanation:
It is a simple division question
18 / (2/3)
Multiply by reciprocal
18 * 3 / 2 = 27
