1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Salsk061 [2.6K]
3 years ago
15

use a calculator and work out the following and write all the figures from your work display. a) (6.2 - 3.51) x (11.7 x 0.3)

Mathematics
1 answer:
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Solving the expression: (6.2 - 3.51) \times (11.7 \times 0.3) we get 9.4419

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to solve the expression: (6.2 - 3.51) \times (11.7 \times 0.3)

According to DMAS rules first we solve brackets and then we will multiply the results found after solving brackets

So,

(6.2 - 3.51) \times (11.7 \times 0.3)\\=2.69 \times 3.51\\=9.4419

First we solved the terms (6.2-3.51) and get 2.69 and by solving (11.7 x 0.3) we get 3.51

Now, we will multiply 2.69 with 3.51 to get the final result.

The final result is 9.4419

So, solving the expression: (6.2 - 3.51) \times (11.7 \times 0.3) we get 9.4419

You might be interested in
"Immediately after a ban on using hand-held cell phones while driving was implemented, compliance with the law was measured. A r
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2  

    Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2

(b) We conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 1,250 drivers found that 98.9% were in compliance. A year after the implementation, compliance was again measured to see if compliance was the same (or not) as previously measured.

A different random sample of 1,100 drivers found 96.9% compliance."

<em />

<em>Let </em>p_1<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance initially</em>

p_2<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance one year later</em>

(a) <u>Null Hypothesis</u>, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2      {means that there is not any statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

<u>Alternate Hypothesis</u>, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2     {means that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

The test statistics that will be used here is <u>Two-sample z proportion statistics</u>;

                     T.S.  = \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{ \frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2}} }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance initially = 98.9%

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance one year later = 96.9%

n_1 = sample of drivers initially = 1,250

n_2 = sample of drivers one year later = 1,100

(b) So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.989-0.969)-(0)}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.989(1-0.989)}{1,250} + \frac{0.969(1-0.969)}{1,100}} }  

                                           =  3.33

<u>Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by;</u>

         P-value = P(Z > 3.33) = 1 - P(Z \leq 3.33)

                                            = 1 - 0.99957 = <u>0.00043</u>

Since in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 5% significance level, the z table gives critical values between -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

<em>Since our test statistics does not lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which </em><u><em>we reject our null hypothesis.</em></u>

Therefore, we conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the y-value of the solution to the system of equations?
motikmotik

Answer:

{x = -3 , y=2  (Isolved for both variables be elimination)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve the following system:

{3 x + 5 y = 1 | (equation 1)

7 x + 4 y = -13 | (equation 2)

Swap equation 1 with equation 2:

{7 x + 4 y = -13 | (equation 1)

3 x + 5 y = 1 | (equation 2)

Subtract 3/7 × (equation 1) from equation 2:

{7 x + 4 y = -13 | (equation 1)

0 x+(23 y)/7 = 46/7 | (equation 2)

Multiply equation 2 by 7/23:

{7 x + 4 y = -13 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 2 | (equation 2)

Subtract 4 × (equation 2) from equation 1:

{7 x+0 y = -21 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 2 | (equation 2)

Divide equation 1 by 7:

{x+0 y = -3 | (equation 1)

0 x+y = 2 | (equation 2)

Collect results:

Answer:  {x = -3 , y=2

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Solve for x: x/12 + 15 = 648
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

1. x = 7596

2. x = -6.25

3. x = 8.5  

hope this helps:)

6 0
3 years ago
What’s the answer for A B and C?
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

a = 2

b = 3

c = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

       First, let us look at the first two (far left) fractions to solve for a.

Since 2^5 = 2^5, nothing needs to change in the numerator. 4 = 2^{2}

    a = 2.

       Next, we will look at the first and third fractions to solve for b.

2^5 = 32

32 / 4 = 8

2^3 = 8

    b = 3

       Lastly, we will solve for c.

All of these fractions simplify to 8 and are equal to each other.

    c = 8

6 0
1 year ago
Which ratios correctly compare bananas to apples, as<br> shown in the image? Check all that apply.
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

where's the picture bro?

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Given: f(x) = x - 7 and h(x) = 2x + 3
    11·1 answer
  • Decide whether JKLM is similar to NPRS. Explain your reasoning.
    7·2 answers
  • Please help I have no clue what I'm doing!!! Thanks :)
    14·1 answer
  • Durante la settimana visiteranno il parco 72 bambini.per ogni bambino viene preparata una scatola rettangolare,in cui sistemare
    5·1 answer
  • What are the steps of changing 2x 3y = 1,470 into slope-intercept form?
    10·1 answer
  • When Mei does 17 push-ups and 6 sit-ups, it takes a total of 35 seconds. In comparison, she needs 41 seconds to do 20 push-ups a
    13·1 answer
  • Ezekiel Elliot rushed for 68, 112, -24, 32, -14, and 127 yards in his first six football games. What was his total number of rus
    14·1 answer
  • I need help its hard plz I'm trying to do a test and I need help plz I will give u 5 stars and a heart plz I have asked 6 times
    14·2 answers
  • Two cars traveled equal distances in different amounts of time. Car A traveled the distance in 2.4 h, and Car B traveled the dis
    12·1 answer
  • Solve using substitution
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!