Answer: the circle wth 3 covered goes in 1/2 and the rectangle and the other circle go in 3/5 the small square with 2 covered goes in other and the long line of squares goes in other
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given - In selecting a sulfur concrete for roadway construction in regions that experience heavy frost, it is important that the chosen concrete has a low value of thermal conductivity in order to minimize subsequent damage due to changing temperatures. Suppose two types of concrete, a graded aggregate and a no-fines aggregate, are being considered for a certain road. The table below summarizes data on thermal conductivity from an experiment carried out to compare the two types of concrete.
Type ni xi si
Graded 42 0.486 0.187
No-fines 42 0.359 0.158
To find - a. Formulate the above in terms of a hypothesis testing problem.
b. Give the test statistic and its reference distribution (under the null hypothesis).
c. Report the p-value of the test statistic and use it to assess the evidence that this sample provides on the scientific question of difference in mean conductivity of the two materials at the 5% level of significance.
Proof -
a.)
Hypothesis testing problem :
H0 : There is significant difference between mean conductivity for the graded concrete and mean conductivity for the no fines concrete.
H1 : There is no significant difference between mean conductivity for the graded concrete and mean conductivity for the no fines concrete.
b)
Test statistic :




⇒Z(cal) = 3.3687
Z(tab) = 1.96
As Z (cal) > Z(tab)
So, we reject H0 at 5% Level of significance
p-value = 0.99962
Hence
There is significant difference in mean conductivity at the two materials.
The length of OM is 4/3 the length of OJ, and the length of ON is 4/3 the length of OK. Thus, two pairs of sides from the triangles are proportional to each other.
Also, angle O from one of the triangles is equal to angle O of the other triangle because they are the same angle.
Thus, the two triangles are similar by SAS (side-angle-side) similarity theorem. This theorem is quite similar to the SAS congruence theorem.
To make a similarity statement, we just have to match corresponding parts when naming the triangle.
Similarity statement: ΔOJK~ΔOMN
I don’t see any images but any angle measured less than 90 degrees is an acute angle
Answer:
Take 16.28 x 8%. You get $1.30 so add 16.28 to 1.30 to get 19.58
Step-by-step explanation: