Yeah, this is not a proper question.
Answer: Decreased assets and liabilities.
Explanation:
Both assets and Liabilities decrease as a result of the April transaction because first, Cash is used to pay the Dividend which reduces the cash account and Cash is an Asset.
Liabilities also decrease because when the dividends were declared in February, Despot Inc had to create a liability in their books to cater for the payment of the dividends. Now that the dividends have been paid, that figure will be removed therefore reducing Liabilities.
Answer:
(a) Income Statement
Belyk Paving Co.
Income statement for the year xxxx
Sales $2,384,000
Cost of goods sold $1,441,000
Gross Profit $943,000
Administrative and selling expenses $436,600
Depreciation expense $491,600
Operating Income 14,800
Interest expense $216,600
Income before Tax ($201,8000)
Tax rate 35% <u> $0 </u>
Net Loss <u>($201,800)</u>
(b) operating Cash flow
Net Loss ($201,800)
Add: Non cash Expenses (Depreciation) <u> $491,600</u>
Cash flow from operating activities <u> $289,800 </u>
Answer
Price of bond = 17.96825
Explanation:
Bond price = ∑(C / 
)+ P /
where
n = no. of years
C = Coupon payments
YTM = interest rate or required yield
P = Par Value of the bond
put values in above equation
price = (5.66%/2) × 2000 × (0.31746) + ( 2000 ÷ 4.595×
)
= 17.96825
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
