Answer: "TRUE" .
____________________________________
Answer:
Job sharing
Explanation:
Job sharing occurs when two people share a job equally. In job sharing, the employees share the duties of a full-time job, and receive the salary and added benefits for working equally. Job sharing provides an opportunity for people to work on parttime basis, it could be alternative days, mornings or evenings, every other week, etc.
Also, we can say that job sharing gives room for two people to do a full-time job on a part-time basis. Both employees are equally apportioned tasks equally and also work as a team in order to achieve results.
Answer:
A common mistake when evaluating and documenting skill sets would be: confusing activities with accomplishments.
Explanation:
When evaluating and documenting skill sets it is a common mistake that people confuse activities wiht accomplishments. One thing is what a person does, like all the activities she preformes in it´s job, or life itself. By the other hand there is what a person has accomplished in his or his life, it can be of course a high position she expected, or a degree obtained. This two differences are often cofused.
Answer:
mid-to-late 3rd century to 543 CE
Explanation:
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
