Explanation:
I mean, everybody deserves to have an achievement plan. So why not make one from it?
I would say letter “E” but the government already knows all of our personal information, so whats the point... probably being watched threw your computer/phone camera rn
Answer:
It would be A. None of these items.
Explanation:
Insurance would never cover a TV, headphones, and two laptops.
Answer:
B. increasing returns initially and eventually diminishing returns.
Explanation:
Average variable cost initially, is high and tends to reduce with increasing number of units and on the long run then it ultimately tends to decrease.
Initially the returns are high on per unit, after that the company's return per unit decreases and the cost per unit in terms of variable cost also increases.
Average variable cost is less in the curve in the short middle term, then it tends to rise, as because variable cost starts increasing.
The company shall wisely choose to stop the production when the variable cost is increasing with a higher percentage than the decreasing revenue.
Answer:
The risk free rate (Rf) is 28,2%
Explanation:
We will substituting the portfolio expected return (Er) and the betas of the portfolio in the expected return & beta relationship, that is:
E[r] = Rf + Beta * (Risk Premium)
On doing this we get 2 equations in which the risk free rate (Rf) and the risk premium [P] are not known to use:
12% = Rf + 1 * (P - Rf)
9% = Rf + 1.2 * (P - Rf)
On solving first equation (of Portfolio A) for P(risk premium), we get:
12% = Rf + 1 * (P - Rf)
12% = Rf + P - Rf
(Rf and Rf cancels each other)
P = 12%
Now, on using the value of P in second equation (of Portfolio B), and solving for Rf (risk free rate), we get:
9% = Rf + 1.2 * (12.2% - Rf)
9% = Rf + 14.64% -1.2Rf
1.2Rf - Rf = 14.64% - 9%
0.2Rf = 5,64%
Rf = 5.64% / 0.2
Rf = 28,2%
So, the risk free rate (Rf) is 28,2%
