What were Lamarck’s ideas about evolution and why were those ideas incorrect?

2 answers:

8 0

Lamarck believed that the stretching elongated the giraffe's neck, which became a useful characteristic and was passed onto future generations. This resulted in the length of the giraffe's neck increasing over time. It is now commonly accepted that Lamarck's ideas were wrong.

tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Lamark suggested that organisms can acquire traits which benefit them without any genetic means. He suggested that a change was gradually introduced into organisms of a species during their lifetime and this change could then be seen in the offsprings.

This idea was wrong because an organisms characteristics cannot change in his lifetime.

The theory of Lamarck's inheritance can be disregarded by our knowledge about hereditary genetics.

You might be interested in

• describe the five parts of the experiential approach to innovation

Kazeer [188]

<span>Design iteration, product prototype, testing, milestones, and multifunctional teams it takes all these steps to understand the 5 parts of a esperiential approach</span>

4 0

3 years ago

four most important countries of each bloc that participated in the first world war PLEASEEEE IT'S FOR TODAY!!!!!!!

kumpel [21]

Major reference

The major Allied powers in World War I were Great Britain (and the British Empire), France, and the Russian Empire, formally linked by the Treaty of London of September 5, 1914.

6 0

3 years ago

One cause of the French Revolution was the failure of the monarchy to

amm1812

Explanation:

The upheaval was caused by widespread discontent with the French monarchy and the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI, who met his death by guillotine, as did his wife Marie Antoinette.

7 0

3 years ago

How did the united states gain control of the philippines?

Ulleksa [173]

As part of the 1898 Treaty of Paris that ended the Spanish American War, Spain agreed to cede the Philippine Islands to the United States for $20 million.

6 0

3 years ago

4. In a short paragraph, describe the transition of Rome from a republic to an empire. What was the republic like, and what caus

postnew [5]

Answer:

Over a period of nearly 200 years, however, the plebeians fought for and gained power within the government.

At the heart of the Roman Republic was the Senate. The Senate advised on matters pertaining to rules governing the city and population. In the republic, members of the patrician class served as advisers to the other governing bodies of the republic. Although the Senate did not formally make laws, the prestige of its members gave the Senate great influence over Rome’s law-making bodies.

The Senate lasted as a sole governing body for the republic for only a brief time, lasting from the republic’s founding in 509 B.C.E. until 494 B.C.E., when a strike orchestrated by the plebeians resulted in the establishment of the Concilium Plebis, or the Councilof the Plebs. This gave the plebeians a voice in the government. As a result, new legislative, or law-making, bodies of the Roman Republic were formed. Called assemblies, these legislative bodies shared power in the following ways:

Comitia Centuriata — This body decided about war, passed laws, elected magistrates (consuls, praetors, and censors), considered appeals of capital convictions, and conducted foreign relations.

Concilium Plebis — This body elected its own officials and formulated decrees for observance by the plebeian class; in 287 B.C.E., it gained the power to make all decrees binding for the entire Roman community.

Comitia Tributa — The tribal assemblies, open to all citizens (who only could be free, adult males), elected minor officials, approved legislative decisions often on local matters, and could wield judicial powers but could only levy fines rather than administer punishment.

Leading the republic were two consuls who were elected by legislative assemblies. They served for one year, presided over the Roman Senate, and commanded the Roman military. Though their power was somewhat limited by the establishment of other magistrate positions, the consuls were effectively the heads of state.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago