Answer:
$2,319,000
Explanation:
Amount
March1 $1,884,000
June 1 $1,284,000
Dec 31 $3,082,450
Capitalization period
March1
10/12×$1,884,000 =$1,570,000
June 1
7/12 $1,284,000=$749,000
Dec 31
0
Weighted Average Accumulated expenditure
March 1 $1,570,000
June1 $749,000
Dec 31 $0
Total $2,319,000
Answer:the first one is correct
and the second one
Explanation:
Answer:The Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012 (ACNC Act) governs eligibility of a not-for-profit entity to be registered as a charity for federal purposes, and establishes governance standards and reporting requirements for registered organizations
WARNING: I am not sure I am right
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Share price of company is $28.20.
b) So value of unlevered firm is $4.512 million.
Explanation:
a.
Share price = Value of debt / (160,000 - 110,000)
= $1,410,000 / 50,000
= $28.20
Share price of company is $28.20.
b.
VAlue of all equity firm = Number of share outstanding × Price per share
= 160,000 × $28.20
= $4.512 million
Value of levered firm is $4.512 million.
Since tax rate is zero, so value of levered firm equal to value of unlevered firm.
So value of unlevered firm is $4.512 million.
Complete question:
On January 1. Year 1. White Co. sold a property with a remaining useful life of 20 years to Blue Co. for $900.000. At the same time. White entered into a contract with Blue for the right to use the property (leaseback) for a period of 6 years. with annual rental payments of 580.000 that approximate the market rental payments for similar properties. On January 1. Year 1. the carrying amount of the property was 5680.000. and its fair value was 5770.000. A discount rate for the lease of 10% is used by both White and Blue. The present value factor for an ordinary annuity at 10% for 6 periods is 4.3553. The lease does not transfer the property to White at the end of the lease term and does not include a purchase option.
What amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1 ?
A. $0
B. $130,000
C. $90,000
D. $220,000
Answer:
$90,000 amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1
Explanation:
If the leaseback is known as an operating lease, the original transition to the buyer-lessor of the asset should be taken into account as the selling of an asset, given that all the income identification requirements have been fulfilled.
If the deal is of equal value, the lender lease is informed of the gain or loss of sale between the purchase price and the sum of the land that is held. Yet this is not a equal value trade. The property's sale price is higher than its market value. Accordingly, the income or loss on sale seems to be the difference between the equal worth and the value of the land.
Therefore, on 1 January, White records a benefit of $90,000 in revenue of $770,000 (fair value of $680,000 in carrying amounts)
