If the purpose of a licensing statute is to raise revenue, a contract with an unlicensed professional may be enforceable is TRUE.
Revenue raising statutes. these are licensing statutes enacted to elevate money for the government. unlicensed persons can put in force contracts and recover for rendering services.
Specialists to gain a license, authorities has some say over who can carry out which jobs as well as how many people can perform those jobs. 2. the second main purpose of licensing statutes is extra intently related to the general public interest.
Business licenses preserve corporations accountable for their sports and conduct and guard the general public's fitness and safety. professional licenses imply the quantity of competence and know-how that a specific professional possesses.
Learn more about licensing statute here:- brainly.com/question/15443448
#SPJ4
Answer:
PV= $1,311.17
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future Value (FV)= $5,000
Number of periods (n)= 25 years
Interest rate (i)= 5.5% compounded annually
T<u>o calculate the present value (PV), we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
PV= FV / (1+i)^n
PV= 5,000 / 1.055^25
PV= $1,311.17
The case of Dole bananas has been referred to in the press and business publications as an example of right-minded import protection in the United States.
<h3>What was the case of Dole bananas?</h3>
Dole Foods used a litigation strategy in US courts to discredit Nicaraguan plantation workers, demonstrating how corporations can use the legal system to avoid providing compensation for human rights violations.
In 2004, a group of Nicaraguan banana plantation workers sued Dole and Dow Chemical Companies for causing them to become sterile as a result of their exposure to a US-banned pesticide (DBCP), which the companies told them to use on Nicaraguan plantations in the 1970s.
Therefore, the Dole bananas case has been referred to in the press and business publications as an example of right-minded import protection in the United States.
To learn more about the Dole bananas case, click here:
brainly.com/question/13415326
#SPJ1
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Since Mr. A already owns 75% of common stock (and 85% of nonvoting stock), the extra 5% will result in a total of 80% (and 90%), that means that he cannot recognize any loss or gain resulting from this transaction. This applies to all stockholders that own at least 80% of a company's stocks and transfer property in exchange for more stocks.
