Interesting question
Usually when you look at something like that construction, you think that AB has been bisected by PQ and that the two segments are perpendicular. They are perpendicular but nowhere is that stated. So the answer is C because all the other answers are wrong.
PQ is congruent AB is not correct. As long as the arcs are equal and meet above and below AB there is no proof of congruency. In your mind widen the compass legs so that they are wider than AB and redraw the arcs. You get a larger PQ, but it has all the original properties of PQ except size.
PQ is not congruent to AQ. How would you prove conguency? You'd have to put both lines into triangles that can be proved congruent. It can't be done.
The two lines are not parallel. They are perpendicular. That can be proven. They meet at right angles to each other (also provable).
Vanessa can make 5 portions
A rational number is a number that can be written in the form:
Where p and q are coprimes. We are asked for finite sets, we can rule out options 3 and 4. In the set in option 2 the first element is:
This number cannot be written a ratio. We can rule out option 2.
All the elements in the set from option 1 can be written in the form p/q.Thus, the answer is the first option.
Answer:
27in
Step-by-step explanation:
So, perimeter means we add all the sides together, as opposed to area, where we multiply them together.
9 - 5 = 4.
So the perimeter of the triangle would be:
3+4+
=12
5 + 5 + 4 +1 (the 1 is from 4 -3) = 15
15 + 12 = 27
