1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KatRina [158]
3 years ago
9

Explain ONE way in which the casta system changed European economies in the period c. 1450-c. 1750.

History
1 answer:
nikdorinn [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The casta system

Explanation:

The casta system brought a change in European economics in the period from 1450 to 1750. It was a period when European were engage in the exploration and expansion in America. The casta system denoted and differentiated people based on their birth in society. In America, the Spanish Empire had mixed-race people with enslaved Africans and Native Americans. After the arrival of Spaniards, new cultural groups beginning to come up known as mestizo and creole. Status determined by the birth and pureblood a Spaniard was. The Peninsulares born in Spain and controlled the political and social positions in colonies. The Criollos were Spaniard born in America. Different social groups in Spanish colonies included Native Americans, enslaved Africans, and mestizos, considered as the lowest class.

You might be interested in
Name the 2 of the natural physical barriers around the Fertile Crescent and explain why did not settle there but instead why the
Nuetrik [128]

The natural barriers around the Fertile Crescent are the deserts and the mountains.

The people that migrated in the Fertile Crescent, in what is known as Mesopotamia, moved in there because it was the only place that had nice conditions for living and prosper. The Mesopotamia region was between two very big rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. These two rivers were flooding each year and creating a new very fertile soil, which allowed the people to be engaged in agriculture and have a stable food source, and also to have a stable fresh water source.

On the other hand, the deserts and the mountains, were not providing these condition. The deserts are too dry, there's not enough food and water, and life is extremely hard and has to be in a nomadic style. The mountains are very restrictive in what they offer and in how big of a part of the year. While the summers might be good and provide nice living conditions, the winters are very cruel and can bring death very easily.

6 0
3 years ago
En qué se diferencia la Edad Media del siglo de las luces
erik [133]

Answer:

English?

Explanation:

please send your question in English please

5 0
3 years ago
The virginia plan proposed a weaker executive branch than the new jersey plan. True or false?
Svetach [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Virginia plan proposed a weaker executive branch than the New Jersey plan. Patrick Henry opposed the new constitution because it created a weak national government. ... In order for the bill of rights to become part of the constitution, it had to be approved by the congress and ratified by the states.

4 0
3 years ago
The American colonies were divided into four geographic regions: northern, Mid-Atlantic, Chesapeake, and southern. Using a sente
Yanka [14]

Each of the four geographically divided colonies had their own specific economic activities, mostly influenced by the climate and natural resources of the area.

The Southern colonies had economy based around farming, by mostly producing corn, fruits, vegetables, cotton, tobacco. The Chesapeake economy was based mostly around the production of tobacco. The Mid-Atlantic colonies had economy based are farming grains and oats, though there was also nice income from logging and paper-making. The Northern colonies had economy based around fishing, whaling, as well as shipbuilding. All of the colonies had different development over time because of the differences in what where their economies based around, with some being more successful than others.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the cotton gìn impact agriculture and slavery in the South
frutty [35]
While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did each states delagate respond to the virginia plan
    8·1 answer
  • Why was Shiloh considered a confederate defeat?
    13·1 answer
  • 9. What beliefs, values or morals dictated Greek life?
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following Arab countries fought in wars against Israel EXCEPT _____.
    7·1 answer
  • When did the Americans gain their independence
    8·1 answer
  • The great depression lead to dictators taking power in Europe <br> true or false
    6·1 answer
  • Operation torch was which of the following.
    10·1 answer
  • A tentative outline is the same as a final outline.<br> False<br> True
    14·2 answers
  • What is one way that early humans used resources that were available in the natural environment?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the contributions of dashrath Chand​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!