All categories

2 years ago

Cool names for law enforcement tools which is rare to use but extra cool name

Law

1 answer:

Verdich [7]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Bomb Trainer

We've never seen anything quite like the Cyalume police explosive training simulators. These reusable tools can simulate the blast effects of a real bomb using compressed air reservoirs for the boom and chemical powder for smoke. The non-pyrotechnic devices are so safe that officers can even detonate a bomb vest while wearing one in training. The only protective gear necessary is hearing protection because the crack of these "bombs" hits about 140 decibels. It's also recommended that the devices be used outside because the powder/smoke really makes a mess. Cyalume is working on a way to simulate the flash of a bomb in future versions.

21st-Century Shotgun

If you were going to design a shotgun for a science-fiction movie, you'd probably conceive something like the Kel-Tec KSG. This bullpup pump shotgun has two magazine tubes and the capacity to carry 12 rounds of hurt. Features include an adjustable stock, a Picatinny rail for mounting the latest optics, and a rubber butt pad to minimize recoil. You can buy a cheaper shotgun, but you won’t find a cooler one.

X-Ray Vision

OK. The Range-R system from L-3 CyTerra won't give you Superman's ability to see through almost everything, but it will give you critical intelligence about what’s behind a wall or a door. Bulky, heavy, unwieldy through-the-wall radar systems have been available for more than a decade, but the Range-R is an example of the next generation of this technology; it's handheld. That makes the Range-R the smallest and lightest wall sensor available, and an extremely useful SWAT tool.

Early Warning System

The Chameleon from Morphix Technologies is essentially a "canary in the coal mine" for first responders. This easily worn hazardous chemical detection features inexpensive cassettes that change color when exposed to something nasty. The cost-effective Chameleon has been used for several years by the U.S. military but the company only recently started marketing it to law enforcement.

Rechargeable Pocket Light

We have long been fans of the Quiqlite. Invented by a police officer, this inexpensive ($22 to $50), hands-free, LED light is the answer to the officer's need to keep his or her hands available during a traffic stop. The new Quiqlite X is a much-improved product with a lot of cool new features. The Quiqlite X is rechargeable via a USB cable. Also, the new light has two Cree LEDs that can be operated individually. Other improvements include a timer that shuts off the light after 10 minutes to save battery time, a 360-degree rotating magnetic clip for numerous use options, and an anti-glare visor. The Quiqlite X is available in three versions: white LEDs, red and white LEDs, blue and white LEDs.

Palm-Sized Chemist

The RedXDefense XCAT is a handheld device that can reliably identify narcotics, explosives, and gunshot residue in the field. Scaled down from a military tool called the XPAK, the XCAT is easy to use and relatively inexpensive. All the operator has to do is select the test card that matches the suspected substance, then sample a trace amount of the substance. The chemistry happens in the machine, and the operator receives a simple "yes" or "no" via a red light/green light system.

Total Devastation

Some weapons and some ammunition give you the skin-crawling response of "Jeez, I wouldn't want to get hit with that." That's our response to the new Winchester Segmented Slug. This 12-gauge shot shell features a slug that’s kind of a hybrid between buckshot and a slug. Fired from 50 yards out, it performs like a slug. At 40 yards, it breaks into two pieces on impact. And at 30 yards or less, it's devastating, breaking into three pieces at impact. So it's like getting hit with three slugs at once. If you're worried about liability, Winchester has an answer for that, too. The Segmented Slug stays in one piece and flattens out when it hits barrier material such as glass or steel. Winchester says the Segmented Slug eliminates the need for officers to carry both slugs and buckshot. We don’t know about that, but we do know that this thing is going to absolutely ruin the day of anyone it hits at 30 yards or less.

You might be interested in

Under the Uniform Securities Act, the limited registration provision available to Canadian broker-dealers and their agents permi

Tanzania [10]

Answer and Explanation:

Under the Uniform Securities Act, the limited registration provision available to Canadian broker-dealers and their agents permit such broker-dealers to conduct businesses with interested people who reside in Canada; in addition, broker-dealers can also conduct businesses with Canadians who plan to reside in the state on a temporary basis, and whom they were already familiar with, prior to the time they came to the United States.

4 0

3 years ago

How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio

sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0

3 years ago

I literally put my card number in last week and paid for this, why cant i even get awnsers now.. bs

erastova [34]

Answer: Well people just dont want to answer or its because what ever thing you bought it on which you didn't need to do all you have to do is answer some questions then you will not have ads and you will get points so you can ask questions.

Explanation: YOU SHOULDENT HAVE PUT UR CARD IN

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

in the context of proving actual malice in a defamation lawsuit, reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a statement is p

Nookie1986 [14]

Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

Do you agree with the Supreme Court that donating money is speech, and therefore can't be regulated?

Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Do we have to write the reason type in yes in the comments then I will write down the reason or no then I will not type the reason

Hope this hellped

7 0

3 years ago

Cool names for law enforcement tools which is rare to use but extra cool name ​

Cool names for law enforcement tools which is rare to use but extra cool name