See, your question has some grammatical structure problems, but I think I know what you're asking for.
I will reword your question and answer it to the best of my abilities.
Anything that is about government affairs or how to run a nation is political.
What's about history, how people lived, or social matters is usually cultural.
<span>Which is cultural and which is political (assuming you're referring to those titles listed below)?:
</span><span>In the Navy: A Record of the Navy from 1775 to 1875-- Political
Sculptures of the Late Qing Dynasty-- Cultural
The Social Impact of Literature from the Age of Enlightenment-- Cultural
</span>
<span>Henry IV versus Pope Gregory VII: Who Could Appoint Church Officials?-- Political
The American Revolution: Growing Tensions Between America and Britain-- Political
The Influences of the Star Wars Movies on American Society-- Cultural </span><span>
</span>
The word Vietnam is derived from two Chinese words meaning "the Viet kin in the South". Traditionally, the people of Vietnam have been regarded by westerners as staunchly xenophobic, and, as such, have been viewed as having a long standing contempt for Chinese influence on the region. Border and island disputes have only exacerbated long-standing tensions between the two nations. Vietnam and China share many common cultural traditions which originated from the wet rice cultivation. China controlled Vietnam for about 1000 years, a rule which ended in 939CE. Thus, Vietnamese culture, writing, politics, religion, etc. were sinicized to a a certain degree. Yet the degree to which Vietnam preserved a distinct identity and maintained separate traditions should also be noted. During the 1st and 2nd Indochinese Wars, Vietnam grew closer to PR of China and received some funding, material, and advisors from the PRC. However, war with China in 1979 renewed hostilities. the reason why Vietnam and china are close because is that they are both communism country, there isn't much comminusim country left in the world
"stop the spread of Communism" since the US was still undertaking a role of communist "containment" around the globe.
Hammurabi's Code set laws in the Babylonian empire that applied to everyone. Including Hammurabi himself. This was important because it had never been done before, at least not at such a bit level. Hammurabi's Code inspired many countries to do the same, which led to monarchs being less powerful and was another step in the direction of democracy.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong :)
