Answer:
a) No. The kinetic energy of the ball decreases.
b) The potential energy of the ball increases.
c) The ball would go half of the original distance.
Explanation:
a) The kinetic energy would be converted to potential energy as the ball goes higher. Since the total mechanical energy is conserved, the kinetic energy would decrease.
b) The potential energy of the ball would increase. Since the total mechanical energy of the ball is conserved, the ball would lose speed, and therefore kinetic energy. In order to compensate the loss of kinetic energy, the ball would gain potential energy as it goes higher.
c) The relation of the energy and mass is as follows:

According to the energy conservation

The maximum height that the ball reaches is proportional to the initial velocity. If the ball would be imparted with the same amount of energy, its final potential energy would be the same. However, in order to have the same potential energy (mgh), its height would be half of the original case.

Explanation:
If an object has a moment of inertia I₀ about an axis, then the moment of inertia about a different, parallel axis is I = I₀ + md², where d is the distance between the axes.
For example, consider a horizontal thin rod rotating about a vertical axis passing through its center. It has mass m and length L. Its moment of inertia is known to be I = 1/12 mL².
Now consider the same rod, but this time we move the axis of rotation L/2 to the end of the rod. We can use parallel axis theorem to find the new moment of inertia:
I = I₀ + md²
I = 1/12 mL² + m (L/2)²
I = 1/12 mL² + 1/4 mL²
I = 1/3 mL²
There's really no "why", because it's not difficult at all.
Simply multiply the number of miles by 1,760, and bada boom,
there you have the same distance described in yards.