Answer:
Answered
Explanation:
In this example of research, Dr. O'Malley is obtaining informed consent from his participants as he openly told the participants to that their participation is completely voluntary and that they can stop taking part at any time. Dr. Quick is debriefing her participants.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. a requirement of reason that applies to us regardless of our desires
Explanation:
A categorical imperative is a requirement of reason that applies to us regardless of our desires
According to a German philosopher Immanuel Kant, categorical imperative is a moral law that is unconditional or absolute for all agents,it is also the validity or claim of which does not depend on any ulterior motive or end
For example, if a person wants to stop being thirsty, it is imperative that they have a drink.
Sarcasm, humor, denial, and possibly even deflecting.
Explanation:
Although they are often used interchangeably, mission and vision statements serve different purposes. A mission statement is what a business defines as its purpose today. They start with words such as, "We are," "We serve" and "Our purpose is to..." Vision statements are what you want to see in the future.
Answer:
Effort justification
Explanation:
Social Psychology
This is an aspect of psychology that deals with the application of scientific methods to explain or understand the ways in which a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are affected by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others.
Attitudes
This is simply making decisions in form of a judgements about objects, events, and ideas. It is Partially a result of social norms and it Influence social perception/memories.
Cognitive dissonance theory simply covers the fact that inconsistent cognitions cause discomfort and so we are motivated to reduce discomfort; We merge our attitudes and behaviors by changing attitudes or behaviors.
The Types of cognitive dissonance
1.Post-decision justification
2.Effort Justification
Effort Justification
This is simply the ability of people's to attribute a greater value that is a greater than objective value to an outcome they had to put effort into acquiring or achieving.