Answer:
(2.5 , 3.5)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use the midpoint formula . Here the points are , (2,2) and (3,5) .
• <u>Using</u><u> </u><u>Midpo</u><u>int</u><u> Formula</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u><u> </u>
⇒ M = { (x1 + x2)/2 , (y1 + y2)/2 }
⇒ M = ( 2+3/2 , 5+2/2 )
⇒ M = ( 5/2 , 7/2 )
⇒ M = ( 2.5 , 3.5 )
<h3>
<u>Hence </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>midpoint</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>(</u><u>2</u><u>.</u><u>5</u><u> </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u>.</u><u>5</u><u>)</u></h3>
The answer is A because the square root function needs to be greater than or equal to zero bc the circle is filled and you can’t have a negative radical. It’s also choice A because the -1 is outside of the radical which means it’s being translated downwards from the parent function. Hope that helps ;-;
Answer:
f(x) = -3(x+3)(x-1)
Step-by-step explanation:
x = -3 & 1; f(x) = 9
f(x) = a(x-r1)(x-r2)
f(0) = a(x-r1)(x-r2) = 9; 9 = a(0-(-3))(0-1)
9 = a(3)(-1); 9 = a(-3)
a = -3
f(x) = -3(x+3)(x-1)
Answer:
Definetely, it is reasonable. You may assume that a pet as a companionship will help the elderly feel more comfortable and therefore, happy. There are a few problems tough:
- There is no practical way of meassuring 'happiness'.
- Sometimes, the correlations of two factors may be a coincidence. Scientist should always consider this when they try to claim something byusing some backup logic, like we did.
- Even tough the statement makes some sense, you need to be aware that maybe is not completly positively correlated. Maybe having 20 more pets does not make an elderly happy if it alredy had 1 or 2.
Answer:
New being?
Step-by-step explanation:
