He can install cameras so that way if anyone steals anything it will be caught on camera so A
Answer:
d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice
Explanation:
Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.
They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.
According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.
Hence, the correct answer is d.
Answer:
Roe vs Wade began in 1970 and was officially decided in 1973. Today, it’s viewed as the pivotal case that legalised abortion across America.
Explanation:
Overturning Roe vs Wade and other attacks on abortion access will not make abortion go away; it only serves to make it more unsafe
1.Know emergency exit routes.
2.Avoid skin and eye contact with chemical
3.minimize all chemical exposure
4.no horseplay will tolerate
5.assume that all chemicals of unknown toxicity are highly toxin
A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.
While the process of selecting jurors may be too boring to be featured in popular T.V. crime dramas, any seasoned trial attorney will tell you that a trial can be lost or won in jury selection. So, what exactly makes the process so important? And how do attorneys pick the 'best' jury for each case?
The jury selection process, also know as 'voir dire', involves attorneys from each side taking turns picking the jurors they believe will favor their position over their opponent's. The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge.
