Was a leader chosen in your group? Did a leader emerge? (In complete sentences and take your time please and thank you)

Law

1 answer:

Butoxors [25]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Was a leader chosen in your group? Did a leader emerge? (In complete sentences and take your time please and thank you)

Explanation:

A leader I would not agree with would be Joe Biden. Because of all of his policies and morals that he stands by which are corrupt and harmful to people of color and just overall biased. I think that he is a horrible president and that he wasn’t fit to be a president. He should’ve stuck with being a businessman I would’ve kept my thoughts of religion and my personal opinions out of my candidacy because that is what makes the world corrupt when we lead by our own opinions.

You might be interested in

A direct democracy is different from a republican government in that

vitfil [10]

Answer:

monarchy

An autocracy is a government in which one person has all the power. There are two main types of autocracy: a monarchy and a dictatorship. In a monarchy, a king or queen rules the country. The king or queen is known as a monarch.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?

devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

There are two types of tortious interference

Tortious interference with contract
Tortious interference with good economic advantage.

Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct