According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
Answer:hope this helps
Explanation:
In the 15th century, Europe sought to expand trade routes to find new sources of wealth and bring Christianity to the East and any newly found lands. This European Age of Discovery saw the rise of colonial empires on a global scale, building a commercial network that connected Europe, Asia, Africa, and the New World.
Allocating governmental authority among three separate branches also prevented the formation of too strong a national government capable of overpowering the individual state governments. In order to modify the separation of powers, the framers created a best-known system—checks and balances.
Explanation: im a time lord from the planet gallifrey
Answer:
He often hears the word “abolitionist.” In a city newspaper account of a Northern abolitionist petition, Douglass finally discovers that the word means “antislavery.” When they realize that Douglass is doomed to be a slave for life, the sailors encourage him to run away to the North.
Explanation:
He became a leader in the abolitionist movement, which sought to end the practice of slavery, before and during the Civil War. He continued to push for equality and human rights until his death in 1895.
There worried about Russia <span />