Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
<span>the high expense; electron microscopes are costly</span>
Write a new hypothesis and conduct new experiments to explore the matter. Thus, option "B" is correct.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Hypothesis?</h3>
Hypothesis
The formulation of hypotheses is one of the key steps in the scientific method.
Hypotheses are usually tested using experiments and are usually accepted or rejected depending on the outcome of the experiments.
If a hypothesis is rejected, it does not mean that the entire subject is abandoned. Rather, new hypotheses may be formed and experiments conducted to further explore the subject.
More hypotheses can be found here:
brainly.com/question/23056080
#SPJ1
In developed nations people have more fast food options which lead to cardiovascular disease. As well as screen time all day since this is one of the factors of cardiovascular disease. Undeveloped nations don't have fast-food or television to watch all day, since they play outside.
