Answer:
a) Disclose in the notes
b) no Disclosure
c) Record a liability
Explanation:
There are three scenarios to be considered
1) It is reasonably possible that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. The loss cannot be estimable
First, premise is that Huprey Co. is facing a lawsuit and the possibility of a loss is most possible. If Huprey Co is able to recognize the amount of loss, then he would have been able to record a liability but the inability to estimate the loss means, the company can o<u>nly make appropriate disclosure in notes</u>
2)Huprey is being used for damages of $2 million. It is very unlikely (remote) that Huprey will lose the case.
This second premise is also a lawsuit on damages for $2 million, however, it is most reasonably acceptable that Huprey will win the lawsuit. As such there is no loss, that way there will be no disclosure in Huprey Co's books.
3. Huprey can reasonably estimate that a pending lawsuit will result in damages of $1.25 million, it is probable that Huprey will lose the case.
The probability of losing a case means that there will be a loss to be recorded in the books and since the damages are already estimable to be $1.25 million. Huprey Co should record a liability
The answer is<u> "Whether the gift was reasonable in the circumstances."</u>
The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct is a collection of arranged articulations issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that blueprint a CPA's moral and expert responsibilities. The code builds up benchmarks for evaluator autonomy, respectability and objectivity, duties to customers and partners and acts discreditable to the bookkeeping calling. The AICPA is in charge of drafting, overhauling and reissuing the code every year, on June 1.
Answer:
$3 trillion
Explanation:
Given that,
GDP = $15 trillion
consumption = $10 trillion
Government spending = $2.5 trillion
Taxes = $1 trillion
Net capital inflow = $0.5 trillion
Investment:
= GDP - Consumption - Government spending + Net capital inflow
= $15 - $10 - $2.5 + $0.5
= $3 trillion
We know that savings is equal to investment spending.
Therefore, the total savings for the economy of Neverwhere is $3 trillion.
ANSWERS: There was a format called Company Town where the company would virtually own and control the entire town including daily need item stores. Workers were lured with attractive wages and accommodation. But, the wages were paid in 'Scrips' which were company printed currency meant to be spent in the stores owned by the company owned and controlled stores inside the company town. This led to the employees getting dependent on employers and their personal freedom and space getting interfered by employers. This relation led to the term 'Wage Slavery'. This practice was continued in mining town till 1960s whereas the concept of company town ended in the 1920s.
A strategic alliance is an arrangement between two companies to undertake a mutually beneficial project while each retains its independence.
The agreement is less complex and less binding than a joint venture, in which two businesses pool resources to create a separate business entity.
<h3>What is Joint Venture?</h3>
A joint venture is a child company of two parent companies.
It’s maintained by sharing resources and equity with a binding agreement. Whether it’s formed for a specific purpose or an ongoing strategy, a joint venture has a clear objective, and profits are split between the two companies.
<h3>What is Non – Equity Strategic Alliance?</h3>
In a non-equity strategic alliance, organizations create an agreement to share resources without creating a separate entity or sharing equity.
Non-equity alliances are often more loose and informal than a partnership involving equity. These make up the vast majority of business alliances.
Learn more about strategic alliances here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/19474063</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
