The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The computer output
displays the regression analysis.
Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination r2?
About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination r2?
About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
24 and 9
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi there!
Let x be equal to the larger integer.
Let y be equal to the smaller integer.
<u>1) Construct equations</u>
(The sum of two integers is 33)
(The larger is 6 more than twice the smaller)
<u>2) Solve for one of the integer</u>
Isolate x in the first equation
Plug the first equation into the second
Combine like terms
Therefore, the smaller integer is 9.
<u />
<u>3) Solve for the other integer</u>
Plug in y (9)
Therefore, the larger integer is 24.
I hope this helps!