The amount of money that I would have in the bank account at the end of one year is $1,100.
The real interest rate I would expect to earn on the deposit is 6%.
If I am saving for a gaming computer, at the end of next year I would have enough money.
<h3>What is the value of the money by next year?</h3>
The formula that can be used to determine the money in my bank account next year is:
FV = P (1 + r)^n
Where:
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
1000 x (1.1)^1 = $1,100
<h3>What is the real interest rate?</h3>
The real interest rate is the nominal interest rate less inflation rate.
The real interest rate = 10% - 4% = 6%
To learn more about future value, please check: brainly.com/question/18760477
The correct answer is Neutral stance
Answer:
B. Workers prefer companies that minimize operating costs.
C. The owners of stock are society.
D. Successful companies attract more talent.
Explanation:
The intrinsic stock value does not need to reflect the market value of the company stock. However, the intrinsic stock reflects the company's lucrative aspect, something more intuitive that describes the company's operating. Therefore, a high intrinsic stock value reflects a company with great reputation.
A company with high intrinsic stock will surely attract more talent, as the talent pool is motivated by working in a reputable, efficient company. This kind of company is surely cost-effective in terms of operation too.
Answer:
24.8 per hour
Explanation:
There are 3 workers and hence are three workstations. Consecutive activities are assigned to each workstation such that workload is as uniform as possible
Hence the time in each workstation (WS) is,
WS1 = 45+55+15 = 115 seconds
WS2 = 25+50+5+30 = 110 seconds
WS3 = 95+50 = 145 seconds
Workstation 3 has the highest processing time and hence is the bottleneck and determines the capacity of the process
Therefore capacity = 1/145 per second = 3600/145 per hour = 24.8 per hour
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
