All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is LEAST likely to be a reason for firms to form a cartel?

Business

1 answer:

GalinKa [24]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "C": to raise competition among firms in the cartel.

Explanation:

A cartel is a group of companies or countries working together to regulate the price of a single product they produce in common. The cartel makes it impossible for a foreign business to enter the market and demand lower prices. Cartels are, in most cases, not helpful to customers. They generate high prices that remain unchanged until consumers find alternative ways to purchase the same items.

Under such a scenario, cartels are unlikely to be formed to generate more competition among the companies that compose them.

You might be interested in

Complete each statement with the term that correctly defines.

Mashcka [7]

Answer:

a. Outperform.

b. Gatekeepers.

c. Leveraging.

d. Value creation.

e. Producer.

Explanation:

A platform can be defined as a type of business model that creates value or focuses on assisting participants by facilitating exchanges and interactions between two or more interdependent groups of participants, who are mostly consumers and producers of finished goods and services.

This simply means that, a platform usually creates an effective and efficient market or community network with needed resources, for better interaction and transaction among various participants. Some examples of a platform business are brainly, airbnb, apple, microsoft, uber etc.

The notable characteristics and advantages of a platform business are;

a. Platform businesses tend to frequently outperform pipeline businesses.

b. Platforms scale more efficiently than pipelines by eliminating gatekeepers.

c. Platform businesses leveraging digital technology can grow much faster.

d. Platforms unlock new sources of value creation and supply.

e. Feedback loops from consumers to the producers allow platforms to fine-tune their offerings and to benefit from big data analytics.

5 0

3 years ago

Ian Burns is the new payroll accountant for ECG Marketing. Certain employees have been requesting changes in classification from

Nookie1986 [14]

Solution and explanation:

The Fair Labor Standards Act defines three tests that an employee must be eligible to be considered under the 'Exempt' category.

These include the following :

1.Salary Level Test : Employee must be paid minimum of $23,600 per year ($455 per week) to be considered Exempt.

2.Salary Basis Test : The representative must be paid on a Salary Basis, a fixed ensured least installment must be made for any workweek for the playing out any work. This would be dependent upon admissible and impermissible derivations that decide the premise of installment. Special cases to this standard are School educators, Lawyers, Doctors, and some others.

3.Duties Test : The actual jobs performed by the employee must be within the qualified exempt category of high level work. These are broadly classified as Executive, Professional; and Administrative job duties.

Thus, following out of the above will be considered for the purpose of classification to Exempt employees category:

- Reimbursement of board, lodging, facilities availed

Whether these form part of the compensation structure and the gross payments fall within the ambit of Levels test.

- Compensation such as discretionary bonus

These to be considered as part of Salary and to check whether the payments fall within the above stated levels and also the Basis of these payments whether on continuing salary or otherwise.

-Duties

The actual duties performed to be checked whether these fall within the exempt category.

Thus, the above stated three tests must be cumulatively passed in order to be eligible to classified as 'Exempt' Employee.

8 0

3 years ago

This leadership style can be seen by some employees to be lazy.Immersive Reader

Flura [38]

Answer:

Free-Rein Leadership Style

Explanation:

Check

4 0

2 years ago

Think about what happened to Standard Oil. Write a paragraph in which you explain whether or not you agree with the actions take

hoa [83]

The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.

5 0

3 years ago

MARKETING PLEASE HELP

andre [41]

Answer:

The entire demand curve will shift upwards

Explanation:

SEE IMAGE ATTACHED

The price P of a product is determined by a balance between production at each price (supply S) and the desires of those with purchasing power at each price (demand D). The diagram shows a positive shift in demand from D1 to D2, resulting in an increase in price (P) and quantity sold (Q) of the product.

3 0

3 years ago