1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zysi [14]
3 years ago
9

Describe how john snow's investigation may have differed if the cholera outbreak occurred today. think about the interventions a

nd tests you have explored in this lesson.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
7 0
<span>If John Snow was investigating a cholera outbreak today, he would have access to modern scientific equipment that would allow him to pinpoint the source of the outbreak, such as microscopes with enough power to see the microbes. Additionally, he would know of modern theories of disease and infection, and so would have a better framework to understand the evidence he gathered. The combination of these factors would allow Snow to much more quickly and effectively discover the source of the outbreak.</span>
You might be interested in
How does Schenck use the Constitution of United States to build his argument
swat32

Answer:

The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement about an opinion is false?
pickupchik [31]
Actually, I would argue that to some extend all of them are true:

An opinion is a personal view or attitude.
-this is definitely true, it's basically a definition of an opinion

An opinion is often indicated by the use of adjectives.
-this is true! for example "my teacher is nice"

An opinion is often used as evidence in a news article.
-this is the weakest statement (but I think that it's still not false). I would however choose this as the right answer: opinion is not an evidence for anything except this opinion ( so it's valid for example for the news of "the president thinks that" if the opinion is that of the president.

An opinion has the potential to promote bias. - this is true!

5 0
3 years ago
Rachel is concerned that she might accidentally suffocate her baby if she shares a bed with him. What information can you share
ad-work [718]

Answer:

Parents and infants usually sleep on hard surfaces, such as floor mats, firm mattresses or wooden planks.  

Explanation:

Co-sleeping is like a proximity or nearness or sharing bed with your child. Sharing about the same bed or the same room.  

There are different type of co-sleeping occur in a different culture.

  • Family bed
  • The sidecar arrangement
  • Different bed in the same room
  • The children are permitted in parents' bed when they needed.  

Benefits :

  • Parents get as much need of sleep.
  • Breastfeeding is easy when the baby is nearby to the parents.
  • In parents room baby reduces the risk of SIDS.
7 0
3 years ago
Jeremy stops gambling five minutes after his slot machine last paid off, Jessica is still gambling, even though her slot machine
nataly862011 [7]

Answer:a. shows low resistance to extinction; shows high resistance to extinction

Explanation:

According to psychology, extinction occurs when a conditioned response is slowly eliminated or weakned which over time will result to that behavior being extinct. This means a conditioned behavior is completely eliminated

An example is when you whistle to a dog all the time to come and get food and the dog starts to drool all time at the thought of whistling associated with food , if you gradually start to whistle without carrying the food with you the dog will stop salivating or drooling.

In classical conditioning, when a conditioned stimulus is provided without an unconditioned stimulus the conditioned response eventually get extinct.

Jeremy is not resistant towards getting rid of the gambling behaviour because when he start gambling and is no longer getting paid off he immediately stops so when an unconditioned stimulus is taken away , he stops gambling and if this keeps happening gradually his behavior of gambling will be extinct.

Jessica on the other side continues even when the unconditioned stimulus (being paid off )is taken away she still continues to gamble so she is resistance towards stoping her gambling behavior.

7 0
3 years ago
An amoeba is a
NeTakaya

Answer:

non living

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Common law is law that is created by a legislature. select one: <br> a. True <br> b. False
    6·1 answer
  • Kyle has had trouble reading from an early age. When he was tested by a psychologist, he was diagnosed with a reading disorder.
    8·1 answer
  • What type of music is associated with African culture
    13·1 answer
  • Marilyn thinks a strict class attendance policy is an indication of her professor's overly-controlling personality rather than a
    6·1 answer
  • At the family dinners Peggy is getting to the age where she is overwhelmed by all the noise and chaos around her. She tries to i
    14·1 answer
  • What were the interventions that world leaders used to combat the Great Depression? WILL NAME BRAINLIEST
    13·1 answer
  • Which religion is Janaja related to ?​
    11·1 answer
  • Hhhhhhhhheeeeeeellllllllpppppppppp, plz
    11·2 answers
  • What does the phrase human - shaped tell the reader
    15·1 answer
  • What role can the academic theories of anthropology and sociology play in helping us better understand sports?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!