Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Actually, I would argue that to some extend all of them are true:
An opinion is a personal view or attitude.
-this is definitely true, it's basically a definition of an opinion
An opinion is often indicated by the use of adjectives.
-this is true! for example "my teacher is nice"
An opinion is often used as evidence in a news article.
-this is the weakest statement (but I think that it's still not false). I would however choose this as the right answer: opinion is not an evidence for anything except this opinion ( so it's valid for example for the news of "the president thinks that" if the opinion is that of the president.
An opinion has the potential to promote bias.
- this is true!
Answer:
Parents and infants usually sleep on hard surfaces, such as floor mats, firm mattresses or wooden planks.
Explanation:
Co-sleeping is like a proximity or nearness or sharing bed with your child. Sharing about the same bed or the same room.
There are different type of co-sleeping occur in a different culture.
- Family bed
- The sidecar arrangement
- Different bed in the same room
- The children are permitted in parents' bed when they needed.
Benefits :
- Parents get as much need of sleep.
- Breastfeeding is easy when the baby is nearby to the parents.
- In parents room baby reduces the risk of SIDS.
Answer:a. shows low resistance to extinction; shows high resistance to extinction
Explanation:
According to psychology, extinction occurs when a conditioned response is slowly eliminated or weakned which over time will result to that behavior being extinct. This means a conditioned behavior is completely eliminated
An example is when you whistle to a dog all the time to come and get food and the dog starts to drool all time at the thought of whistling associated with food , if you gradually start to whistle without carrying the food with you the dog will stop salivating or drooling.
In classical conditioning, when a conditioned stimulus is provided without an unconditioned stimulus the conditioned response eventually get extinct.
Jeremy is not resistant towards getting rid of the gambling behaviour because when he start gambling and is no longer getting paid off he immediately stops so when an unconditioned stimulus is taken away , he stops gambling and if this keeps happening gradually his behavior of gambling will be extinct.
Jessica on the other side continues even when the unconditioned stimulus (being paid off )is taken away she still continues to gamble so she is resistance towards stoping her gambling behavior.
