Answer:
The statement is describing the usual difference in trade policy that exists between monarchies and republics.
Explanation:
The excerpt comes from the Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, who was a French philosopher who promoted republicanism and liberalism.
In the text, Montesqueiu is explaining than in monarchies, trade is very restricted, and is usually only allowed for luxury goods like perfums, spices, or silk clothes, because these goods are used by the nobility as a symbol of their power and status.
In monarchies, for the rest of the population, trade is restricted. The common people therefore cannot access goods from abroad, or can only do so at a very high cost.
In republics, Montesquieu says, trade tends to be more open. Merchants become the ones who do most of the trade, guided by their economic ideas. The merchants therefore obtain many goods from abroad, that both the nobility and the commoner can acquire for a lower price.
In conclusion, Montesquieu is using the argument for trade as another reason to support republics over monarchies.
<h3>Samoa is a type of government</h3><h3>Democracy</h3><h3>Parliament system </h3><h3>Unitary State </h3><h3>Parliament Republic</h3>
<h3>The Samoan Way,the culture is heavily focused on family,respect of elders and being of service to others. The three structural elements to Fa'a Samoa are the matai ( chiefs ), aiga ( extended family ), and the church</h3>
It could keep people from living there lives
Some states added the bill of rights because it made laws that contributed to the citizens like freedom of speech, searches and freedom of religion. tell me if this is wrong. :p
\
