The process through which a product or service takes root initially in simple applications at the bottom of a market and then moves up, eventually displacing established companies, is referred to as <u>Disruptive Innovation</u>.
In a business idea, disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a brand new market and price network or enters at the lowest of an existing market and in the end displaces established marketplace-leading companies, products, and alliances.
Disruptive innovation refers to using a generation that upsets a structure, instead of "disruptive technology", which refers back to the era itself. Amazon, launched as an online bookstall in the mid-Nineties, is an example of disruptive innovation.
Disruptive innovation is the manner by using which a smaller enterprise—normally with fewer sources—moves upmarket and demanding situations larger, hooked-up corporations.
Learn more about disruptive innovation here brainly.com/question/17185200
#SPJ4
Heyyyyyy thanks for the points, have a nice day/night wtv :)
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": both the value of a good to society and the cost to society of making the good.
Explanation:
Price is the monetary value of a good or service that consumers are willing to pay and producers are willing to accept. <em>For companies, it represents the production costs of the good plus the unitary revenue they expect to obtain. For consumers, it is the value they provide to the good offered according to the type of need the good is destined to fulfill.</em>
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
