Answer:
The kind of corporate takeover technique implemented in the film is proxy fight.
Explanation:
A proxy fight is termed as a technique where two corporate factions ask the stakeholders for the proxy votes such that the right of voting is transferred.
In this case both the parties, the heiress as well as the opponent is asking for the right of vote from stakeholders so that they can decide the corporate future. This is the key feature of the proxy fight and thus this is the correct option.
Answer:
$33,630
Explanation:
Given that the company's collection history shows that 43% of credit sales are collected in month of sale and the remainder (57%) is collected in the following month then, in the month of January, Cash collections in January from December credit sales would be equivalent to 57% of December Credit sales. Using the actual figures,
Cash collections in January from December credit sales would be
= 57% * 59,000
= $33,630
Answer:
monthly payment = (total amount owing+interest to be paid) / 12 months
Explanation:
Monthly repayments include the total amount owing on the credit card, plus the interest to be paid. This amount should then be divided into 12 monthly payments in order to get one constant amount to be paid each month for the 12 month period. We will assume there are no other factors affecting the amount, other than interest.
The formula to calculate the monthly repayments in the credit card is as follows:
(total amount owing + interest) / 12 months
For example, say the amount owing was $100 and the total interest to be paid was $20; the monthly repayment would be calculated as ($100+ $20) / 12 months. This would mean the credit card holder pays $120/12 = $10 per month in order to repay the debt.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon’s relationships with her employees are strained, but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
Explanation:
Austrian organizational psychologist Fred Fiedler (<em>1922-2017</em>) proposed in his Theory of Contingency that leaders only have one leadership style and that they cannot shape it according to the different situations they might be involved in. Instead, leaders must be located in a situation that matches their style.
Since Sharon's leadership style is <em>autocratic</em>, she is likely to manage herself better in adverse situations where the subordinates still follow her instructions.
