No, it is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that is obtained when you cube an integer. For example, 8 (cube of 2), 27 (cube of 3) and 64 (cube of 4). Since -3 cannot be obtained by cubing an integer, it is not a perfect cube.
Answer:
the price went up 44.44%
Step-by-step explanation:
200÷450×100
The length of tom's block on his map is 11.25 inches
For this case, the parent function is given by:

We apply the following function transformation:
Vertical compressions:
To graph y = a * f (x)
If 0 <a <1, the graph of y = f (x) is compressed vertically by a factor a. (Shrinks)
We have then:

Horizontal translations:
Suppose that h> 0
To graph y = f (x + h), move the graph of h units to the left.
We have then:

Vertical translations:
Suppose that k> 0
To graph y = f (x) + k, move the graph of k units up.
We have then:
Answer:
Vertical compression by factor of 1/2. Horizontal displacement 3 units to the left. Vertical displacement 2 units up.
The price will decrease by $2132
<u>Step-by-step explanation</u>
Given that the next model of the sports car will cost 5.2% less than the current model.
The price of the current model=$41000
The price of the next model will be 5.2% less than $41000


There is a $2132 decrease in prize of the sports car.