Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Rotating the entire polygon should have no effect on its internal angles. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead! Feel free to ask more questions here in Brainly.
Answer:
ok
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes because 84+45 is 129 and 3(28+15) is 129
Answer:
The potential energy of the ball having 2kg mass would be 
J
Step-by-step explanation:
I am assuming the ball has a mass of 2 kg, as you have not mentioned the mass of a ball.
Considering the formula for calculating the gravitational potential energy
As
kg
Acceleration of gravity = g = 9.8 
As the ball is on the height = h = 20 meters
So,
J
Therefore, the potential energy of the ball = J
Keywords: potential energy, Gravitation potential energy
Learn more potential energy from brainly.com/question/14022793
#learnwithBrainly
