Answer:
early adopter
Explanation:
early adopter means a person who used company or organization new and innovative product, goods and technology before the usage of other customer. so in this case Fred is early adopter who evaluate each products before adopting and common use.
Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
The essay “Jesus Shaves” by David Sedaris is part of his book <em>Me Talk Pretty One Day</em> and it tells the story of a French class he was in while studying abroad in Paris. The class is trying to explain to a Moroccan student what Easter is, but their lack of language skills make for a comical attempt.
Part of the reason why the essay resonates with so many people is because of his description of experiences that are common to all students.
First, the fact that the Moroccan student asks a basic, obvious question that is very pertinent to the topic, yet no one really knows how to explain it despite its simplicity.
Also, the way Sedaris defends American traditions when questioned by his teacher exemplifies the experience any student has when challenged by a professor.
Most importantly, the difficulty and frustration any language learner experiences when they are trying to explain themselves, yet they lack the words to do so as precisely as they would like.
Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
The answer is "Heritability".
Heritability reflects the way that all people in any types of living things contrast from multiple points of view among each other. The variety (~differences) among people inside a species relies upon both genetic and ecological contrasts. For instance, individuals differ in height.