With the westward expansion, there was a growing class of farming people who owned huge lands and had farms and ranches. When things such as failing crops or harsh economy hit, they wanted help and since they couldn't get it, their discontent grew, which is why they formed the Populist party.
The scenario above illustrates the initial step in a process known as FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS. Functional analysis in behavioral psychology involves applying the law of operant condition to establish the links between stimuli and responses. It is an assessment skill which guides case formulation.
Answer:
Explanation:
The term “Green New Deal” was first used by Pulitzer Prize-winner Thomas Friedman in January 2007. America had just experienced its hottest year on record (there have been five hotter since), and Friedman recognized that there wasn’t going to be a palatable, easy solution to climate change as politicians hoped. It was going to take money, effort, and upsetting an industry that has always been very generous with campaign contributions.
Transitioning away from fossil fuels, he argued in a New York Times column, would require the government to raise prices on them, introduce higher energy standards, and undertake a massive industrial project to scale up green technology.1
“The right rallying call is for a ‘Green New Deal,’” he wrote, referencing former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's domestic programs to rescue the country from the Great Depression. “If you have put a windmill in your yard or some solar panels on your roof, bless your heart. But we will only green the world when we change the very nature of the electricity grid—moving it away from dirty coal or oil to clean coal and renewables.”
Since then, the “Green New Deal” has been used to describe various sets of policies that aim to make systemic change. The United Nations announced a Global Green New Deal in 2008.2 Former President Barack Obama added one to his platform when he ran for election in 2008,3 and Green party candidates, such as Jill Stein and Howie Hawkins, did the same.4
There are several reasons why group problem-solving and decision making is more likely to produce the correct answer than in an individual setting.
One reason is that groups who act in a cooperative manner tend to do better than individuals, who are in a more competitive atmosphere. Group interaction facilitates collaboration, fresh ideas, and improved solutions.
Another reason why groups tend to do better is that a group has a better collective memory than one person does.
Lastly, a group working together can draw upon each other's strengths and talents, making the group more well-rounded and resource rich.
