This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.
FOR
-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights
-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.
-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority
-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest
-corruption
AGAINST
-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?
-wrongfully convicted
apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though
Answer:
guide and inspire good conduct
Explanation:
APA are rules of proper source documentation to avert difficulty. This makes you feel that you are not alone. Having to follow detailed citation and formatting guidelines as well may seem like just one more task to add to an already-too-long list of requirements.
Answer:
DTS
Explanation:
CTO AMENDMENT: Identifies that a travel document has been changed after it has been approved.
DTS AMENDMENT: It is a change made to a travel document any time after APPROVED
Answer:
Individuals and higher education levels
Explanation:
they are more likely to be inform about issues and more willing to invest the time and energy in joining an interest group that represents their views. They also are more likely to understand how important and you are in shaping public policy.
I think yes but I would look it up
