1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Iteru [2.4K]
2 years ago
5

What does Brutus say would have happened if the senators had not killed Caesar

History
1 answer:
Lena [83]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

He says that if Caesar had been allowed to live, then the Roman people would've been turned into his slaves ... If Caesar hadn't been killed, he would've destroyed the ancient traditions of republican Rome. Even if he never actually called himself a king, he would still effectively be one.

You might be interested in
Who was the head of the Mexican colonial government? governor mayor king viceroy
ludmilkaskok [199]
The head of the Mexican Colonial Government is the Mayor.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“When a new hand, one unaccustomed to the business, is sent for the first time into the field, he is whipped up smartly and made
Kipish [7]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was seen as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine and was used to bring
lozanna [386]

Answer:

the Big brother policy was an extension of the Monroe doctrine formulated by James g Blaine in the 1880s that aimed to Rally Latin American Nations behind us leadership and open their market to us traders Blaine served as secretary of State in 1881 under President James a Garfield.

7 0
2 years ago
Was there a conflict between the culture* of India and the culture* of Britain?
Olin [163]

Answer:

The Britishers were instrumental in introducing Western culture, education and scientific techniques. Through those means, they gave traditional Indian life a jolt and galvanized the life and culture of its people. Undoubtedly, the Seventeenth Century marked the zenith of Indian medieval glory.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following might be considered a valid source for online research? Select all that apply.
sergejj [24]
Well, here is a hint. Anything ending in (.com) is not usually trustworthy, because they are usually trying to sell something, or are just not accurate. (.gov) is trust worthy I guess, but they are telling you what you want to hear. (WIKI IS NOT TRUSTWORTHY AT ALL) (.edu) would be the best, or (.org)
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did railroads became the key to America's economic growth after the American Civil war?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the difference between expectations for World War I and the reality of
    10·1 answer
  • After world war ii, western germany became the _______, or west germany.
    9·1 answer
  • Which was a major accomplishment of Ramses II?
    11·2 answers
  • Which was not a member of the early Chinese social classes?
    8·1 answer
  • What factors contributed to the start of the great depression?
    11·1 answer
  • Answer this question
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best defines what a charter was in 1500s?
    15·2 answers
  • In a free market, supply and demand determines?
    12·2 answers
  • How did british railroad workers solve the problem of finding materials to build foundations
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!