Answer:
$104
Step-by-step explanation:
First, convert 60% to a decimal.
60% = 0.6
Now, multiply the cost to buy the camera ($65) by the decimal.
$65 × 0.6 = $39
Now, add this amount to the amount it cost to buy the camera.
$65 + $39 = $104
The selling price for the camera will be $104.
Answer:
So I would say your answer is..............A
Step-by-step explanation:
For most places, global warming will result in more frequent hot days and fewer cool days, with the greatest warming occurring over land. Longer, more intense heat waves will become more common. Storms, floods, and droughts will generally be more severe as precipitation patterns change
Also, A is correct because lets say you put an ice cube in the sun...okay well if it keeps getting hotter and hotter multiply ice cubes into ice caps. Well same thing will happen. It will melt causeing water from the ice caps. Which will result into more water. Which will cause water to go above sea level!
Hope this helps!!!
Using transformations and congruency concepts, it is found that with these following transformations, the triangles will be congruent.
- A reflection, then a translation.
-
A rotation, then a reflection.
--------------------------
- Two triangles are congruent if they have the <u>same lengths</u> of the sides and the <u>same angles.</u>
- In a reflection, there is a rule that changes the <u>coordinates (x,y)</u>, but does <u>not </u>change <u>the lengths</u> of the sides of the triangles, thus they will still be congruent.
- A <u>reflection is also a special case of rotation</u>, thus, in a rotation, the triangles are also congruent.
- A translation is also similar to a reflection, using rules to shift the triangle up, down, left or right according to it's coordinates, not changing the sides or angles, thus congruent.
- In a dilation, the <u>lengths of the sides are changed</u>, thus, the triangles will not be congruent.
--------------------------
Thus, from the bullet points above, the correct options are:
- A reflection, then a translation.
- A rotation, then a reflection.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24267298
Answer: he hiked 5.6 miles up the canyon.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent his speed hiking uphill.
His speed running downhill was 2.8 mph greater than his speed hiking uphill. This means that his speed running downhill would be x + 2.8
Distance = speed × time
Kevin hiked up Lamb’s Canyon in 2 hours. This means that the distance covered by hiking uphill is 2 × x = 2x
He ran back downhill in 1 hour. This means that the distance covered by running downhill is 1 × (x + 2.8) =
x + 2.8
Since the distance uphill is the same as the distance downhill, then
2x = x + 2.8
2x - x = 2.8
x = 2.8
Therefore, the distance hiked up the canyon is
2x = 2 × 2.8 = 5.6 miles
Answer:
Y-Intercept (-3,4) , (19,7). (−3,4) ( - 3 , 4 ) , (19,7) ( 19 , 7 ). Find the value of the slope.
Step-by-step explanation:
