Answer:
6(x-8)=5-2x
Step-by-step explanation:
let the number be x
so we have six times the difference between a number and 8
that is 6(x-8).
is equal to 5 less than twice the number ..we have
=5-2x.
therefore, our answer becomes:
6(x-8)=5-2x
The study of explanatory or independent differences based on the dependent variable is a simple statistical method. The correlation between two variables is researched in which only the explanatory variable of them would be present, and the further discussion can be defined as follows:
For point (i):
- The log(distances) seem to be optimistic, and their valuation is 0.312, which also means that the cost of a house will rise even as the distance increases.
- In this, the certainly is what everybody expects the better the house from the sewage treatment is from a hygienic viewpoint.
For point (ii):
- In this regard, we cannot use straightforward regression, even as non-biased price estimation might not even be provided.
- The price-distance relationship here is not so much linear.
For point (iii):
- Several factors influence the house's price, the biggest contributor is house length, market nearness or public areas, number of rooms, etc.
- Thus the only influence is not the mere distance from the incinerator. It's one of the factors affecting housing pricing.
- The proximity of markets and places can be connected to the distance from the crematorium.
- However, factors such as house size and the number of stories aren't related to the distance from the incineration plant.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/19729277
Let's assume
It started in 2000
so, t=0 in 2000
![P_0=6.4million](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_0%3D6.4million)
we can use formula
![P(t)=P_0 e^{rt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3DP_0%20e%5E%7Brt%7D)
we can plug value
![P(t)=6.4 e^{rt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3D6.4%20e%5E%7Brt%7D)
In 2005, the same survey was made and the total amount of gamma ray bursts was 7.3 million
so, at t=2005-2000=5
P(t)=7.3 million
we can plug value and then we can solve for r
![7.3=6.4 e^{r*5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=7.3%3D6.4%20e%5E%7Br%2A5%7D)
![r=0.02632](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D0.02632)
now, we can plug back
![P(t)=6.4 e^{0.02632t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28t%29%3D6.4%20e%5E%7B0.02632t%7D)
now, we have
P(t)=1 billion =1000 million
so, we can set it and then we can solve for t
![1000=6.4 e^{0.02632t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1000%3D6.4%20e%5E%7B0.02632t%7D)
![t=191.924](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%3D191.924)
approximately
![t=192](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%3D192)
Year is 2000+192
year is 2192................Answer
Answer:
1) Rolling a 3 is unlikely and rolling a 4 is unlikely too.
2) The probability of niki drawing a green marble is likely and the probability of tom drawing a blue marble is unlikely.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Since there is only one 3 out of 6 numbers, the probability of that outcome is 1/6, which is low. The same thing goes for throwing a 4.
2) The reason why it is equally likely for niki drawing a green is because there are more green marbles than the other marbles. You could see it as a fraction as well, which is 4/9 Which is very close to one half (4.5). For tom, there are less blue marbles which brings it down to the unlikely spot (fraction = 3/9)
Hopefully this helps, and hopefully it isn't too confusing.
70% I think beacuse she is making more profit about 70% then she bought it for