1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following was a significant consequence for Georgia as a result of Leo Frank case?

Social Studies
1 answer:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the answer is b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
in scientific inquiry, a stated possible explanation is called/A. a law/B. an observation/C. a theory/D. a hypothesis
goldenfox [79]
The answer is hypothesis.... its 100% correct.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Both Marmor/Mashaw/Harvey and Andrea Campbell discuss our two major types of social welfare programs: public (social) assistance
Tomtit [17]

Answer: C and A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
________ exposure deals with cash flows that result from existing contractual obligations.
zalisa [80]

Transaction exposure deals with cash flows that result from existing contractual obligations.

The degree of uncertainty that businesses engaged in international trade must deal with is known as transaction exposure. It is also known as translation exposure or translation risk .

It is specifically the risk that exchange rates will change after a company has already committed to a financial obligation. These foreign enterprises are extremely vulnerable to changing exchange rates, which can result in significant capital losses.

Transaction exposure often carries only one side of the risk. The only company that might experience this vulnerability is one that completes a transaction in a foreign currency.

To learn more about transaction exposure click here :

brainly.com/question/27961879

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
4. Select the statements that are TRUE about the Executive Branch
olga55 [171]

Answer:

1, 3, 4, 5, 6 are true

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Plz help!
insens350 [35]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a bike race: julie came in ahead of roger. julie finished after james. david beat james but finished after sarah. in what pla
    13·1 answer
  • Public relations efforts are often targeted to more than one group of individuals.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following powers did the national government have under the Articles of the Confederation? Select the THREE correct
    14·1 answer
  • Read the following quotation from Catholic bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet at the court of Louis XIV.
    7·2 answers
  • Engaged employees are more likely to help their colleagues when needed and volunteer to take on extra assignments. these actions
    10·1 answer
  • Write about a natural desaster
    8·1 answer
  • Which describes the goal of Roosevelt's cash-and-carry policy?
    14·2 answers
  • bell hooks describes how many white women activists in the women's liberation movement came to the cause after participating in
    14·1 answer
  • Help pls?<br><br> Explain each of the following terms in your own words. <br><br> Stock -
    13·1 answer
  • Suggest 2 types of activities that can help develop leadership skills and qualities among peers​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!