1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TEA [102]
2 years ago
5

Question 19 of 20

Law
1 answer:
Nookie1986 [14]2 years ago
3 0
It would be D I did the work on this pls thank and put braliest on this pls and thank you
You might be interested in
Who decides whether a suspect will be tried for an alleged crime?
Lerok [7]

Answer:

the judge

Explanation:

i looked it up

don't trust me tho

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.
PIT_PIT [208]
A cult tattoo yeeeeeeett
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements concerning “SIPs” under the Clean Air Act is false? a.) After EPA sets a NAAQS, it is up to ea
Alika [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Which of the following statements concerning “SIPs” under the Clean Air Act is false? a.) After EPA sets a NAAQS, it is up to each state to decide how to achieve the standard b.) If a state uses “tall stacks” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method c.) If a state uses “command and control” to attain a NAAQS, it does not receive credit for the gains achieved by that method d.) Regardless of pollution levels within a state, its SIP may be inadequate if the state contributes significantly to nonattainment in another state e.) In certain circumstances, EPA may reject a state’s proposed SIP as deficient, after which EPA may promulgate a federal implementation plan

7 0
2 years ago
Heyy!! This isn’t a question but there is a petition to get GA (georgia) schools closed for the rest of the year, we are really
Nataly [62]
Ok thank you. no problem
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help! I just need help
amm1812

Answer: C. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to the rights of citizenship, which inflamed sectional tensions that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Details:

Dred Scott was a slave who had been owned by a Missouri man named John Emerson.  Emerson's service in the US military caused him to live for a time in Illinois (which was a free state) and Wisconsin (which was a free territory.  Later, back in Missouri, after John Emerson died, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Emerson's widow, who refused.  With lawyers' help, he then filed suit to gain his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in a free state and free territory.

In Dred Scott  v. Sandford (1857), commonly referred to simply as "The Dred Scott case," the Supreme Court, by a 7 to 2 margin, issued its ruling that Scott was not  entitled to his freedom just because he had lived at some times in free territory.  The Court also ruled that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States, and therefore did not have the legal standing to file such a lawsuit.  The Court further stated that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been an overreach of federal government power -- that any states or territories were free to make their own decisions regarding slavery.

The Dred Scott decision was a controversial event which played into the tensions that by 1861 erupted into the Civil War in the United States.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/10791169#readmore

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Quik Results, Inc., a Maine corporation, makes and sells Power Up!, a weight-gain and muscle-building supplement. Orin, a citize
    10·1 answer
  • What counsel did Brigham Young give to Ephraim Hanks regarding the walls of his adobe house?
    11·1 answer
  • Where is leader is called the “speaker”
    14·1 answer
  • Diferencie preclusão lógica do venire contra factum proprio.
    13·1 answer
  • OJ Simpson's case is an example of both a civil case and a criminal case being brought for the same acts.
    12·2 answers
  • How does international law impact on Australian law and how is international incorporated in Australian law?
    8·1 answer
  • If person B kills person C because person A says " if person b doesn't kill person C then person A will kill person B and his/he
    12·2 answers
  • Under Miranda vs. Arizona, police must advise suspects of all but which of the following rights:
    7·1 answer
  • Anna nicole smith
    11·1 answer
  • What is judicial independence
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!