Answer:
B) It was a major achievement when it was declared "separate but equal" was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Prior to the Brown v. the Board of Education Supreme Court case in 1954, there was a a doctrine in American Constitution law known as "separate but equal". This doctrine allowed people to be segregated by race in public facilities such as schools, trains and bars, as long as the quality of service remained the same.
The Supreme Court in the Brown v. the Board of Education case, ruled that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Therefore, the "separate but equal" doctrine which supported black and white students attending different public schools, was rendered unconstitutional.
The answer is Coastal plain.
Answer: c) achievement
Explanation:
Identity achievement is defined as the level in life where the person identifies himself/herself in true sense.A person tends to explore himself or herself to achieve the knowledge about self, desires, expectation,and choices. It helps in giving a clear view of their career option, further studies choice etc.
According to the question,Laurent is at the stage of identity achievement as he think engineering is the correct field that he should pursue as he has researched about his field choices.He is self identified his career option.
Other options are incorrect because identity is finding self without choice exploration. Identity diffusion is still identifying self and identity moratorium in which searching is alternative choice is done.Thus, the correct option is option(c).
Answer:
Suppose a bill is passed to make minimum hourly wage as $7.50, the implications would be that:
-If the minimum wage is set at $10.50, the market will not reach equilibrium.
-In the absence of price controls, a shortage puts upward pressure on wages until they rise to the equilibrium.
Therefore only the two above listed statements would be TRUE.
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
