Athens was a democracy and Rome was a republic. Keep that in mind because that’s key! So this means your answer would be, Athens voted directly on issues, while in Rome, citizens voted for representatives who voted on issues.
Mead and Goffman both were totally against gender and race discrimination. They wanted to raise voice against it and make people aware to get rid of this problem.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Erving Goffman and Mead were totally against the problem of gender discrimination and the racial discrimination. They wanted to end this problem and wanted to make people also aware about fighting against this problem to get rid of this.
One slogan by Erving Goffman that got famous about the problem of gender discrimination was "personal is political". The meaning of that slogan was that the personal experiences of the women were rooted in their political situation and the inequality done against them.
The word apartheid, the abolished racial segregation practice in South Africa, means Separation in Afrikaans/Dutch.
<h3>What is Apartheid?</h3>
Apartheid, which means "apartness" in Afrikaans, was a legal framework that enforced segregationist practices against South Africans who were not white. The all-white National Party government in South Africa quickly started implementing the country's pre-existing laws of racial segregation after taking office in 1948.
The Apartheid (1948–1994) racial oppression system in South Africa cannot be properly attributed to the Dutch/Afrikaans because by this time the Afrikaner communities had recognized themselves as a distinct people.
Therefore, the term Apartheid, which refers to the South African policy of legalized racial segregation, signifies separation in Afrikaans and Dutch.
To know more about Apartheid refer to: brainly.com/question/3811942
#SPJ4
The answer for your question is......
(a) welfare
Hope it helps !!!!
Karl Polanyi did not say that complete control over the market by the state is the only way to secure the protection of people and the environment from the unhinged nature of capitalist markets. So the given statement is False.
<u>
Explanation:</u>
Karl Polanyi stated that development of states should always go hand in hand with that of the market and that such a change has been indissolubly linked in history. The change to market economy from pre-modern economy was actually harming the human relationships and institutions. Such changes as per Polyani caused destruction of basic social order of the pre-modern history reign.
He stated formation of self-regulating market required separation of Economic and political realms. He did not deny that the self-regulating markets have brought huge amount of material wealth, but he suggests that this is too narrow a focus and more focus should be given on the broader aspects.
