Answer:
Pauls' share in partnership=(131000+91000+111000+171000)*0.15%= $75600
Balance in Caitlin’s capital account immediately after Paul’s admission = 131000-(75600-71000)*30%= $129160
Answer:
A. Recent environmental research reveals that the dust from the limestone quarrying site has severely contaminated the water at a nearby lake.
Explanation:
The limestone production results in huge social effects like, noise pollution, soil pollution, which affects lives of people. And since the manufacturers or producers of limestone do not care about the social results of such production, they shall be liable to pay huge taxes.
As for this, the cause as stated in statement A is absolutely suitable.
Also the prices are more in this area even after so much of social destruction.
Accordingly high taxes as a penalty for such social destruction shall be charged.
Answer:
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Explanation:
<em>Missing information:</em>
a) A $5 dividend
b) Liquidate the entire inventory
c) Retiring the oldest bond
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
------------------
A) dividends would not be the cause as they are determinated by the company they can chose not to declare it.
B) lquidate the inventory means selling and not replenish. This generates cash it doesn't use cash
C) re-rolling the debt (by issuing new bonds) is a course of action planned and that in hte end will not affect the cash of the company as will be paying the bonds and receiving from the new bonds thus the changes in cash would be controlled.
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Answer:
Given these facts, which state would you expect the price of prostitution services to be higher? Why?
- Since the risks associated to prostitution are higher in New Jersey, we could assume that the price for these services will be higher there. The supply curve of prostitution shift to the left, increasing the price and decreasing the quantity.
Which state would have the higher amount of services consumed (adjusted for population differences)? Why? What are the underlying economic issues of this market?
- Since the price is higher in New Jersey, the quantity demanded will be lower. Also, the risks associated to consuming the service will shift the demand curve to the left, reducing the quantity.
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
