Intellectual property laws deal with

Sales Tax Transactions Journalize the entries to record the following selected transactions: a. Sold $62,800 of merchandise on a

Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

Dr Account receivable $65,940

Cr Sales Revenue $62,800

Cr Sales tax payable $3,140

Explanation:

Sales of merchandise inventory on account

Dr Account receivable $65,940

Cr Sales Revenue $62,800

Cr Sales tax payable $3,140

Sales tax payable = Sales Revenue × Sales tax percentage

$62,800×5%

=$3,140

Amount of account receivable

Account receivable = Sales Revenue + Sales tax payable

$62,800+ $3,140

=$65,940

8 0

3 years ago

Emma Jones Company has the following information available: Account 12/31/2019 12/31/2018 Accounts Payable $76,500 $80,000

leonid [27]

Answer:

B. No.

Explanation:

The formula to compute the quick ratio is shown below:

Quick ratio = (Quick assets) ÷ (current liabilities)

where,

For 2018

Quick assets = Accounts Receivable, net + Cash and Cash Equivalents + Short minus Term Investments

= $49,000 + $70,000 + $44,000

= $163,000

And, the current liabilities = Accounts Payable + Income Taxes Payable

= $80,000 + 5,000

= $85,000

Now put these values to the above formula

So, the ratio would equal to

= $163,000 ÷ $90,000

= 1.81 times

For 2019

Quick assets = Accounts Receivable, net + Cash and Cash Equivalents + Short minus Term Investments

= $42,300 + $43,700 + $27,000

= $113,000

And, the current liabilities = Accounts Payable + Income Taxes Payable

= $76,500 + 2,000

= $78,500

Now put these values to the above formula

So, the ratio would equal to

= $113,000 ÷ $78,500

= 1.43 times

No, as it shows declining from 2018 to 2019

3 0

3 years ago

B

ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

1)decrease 2)increase

Explanation:

Because the money come in the business

5 0

3 years ago

Uh is edge supposed to have blank sections? Proof is below!

Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

nope as long as I remember

7 0

3 years ago

Karen and Ethan execute the same roles and responsibilities at their organization. However, Ethan earns more than Karen. Under t

Arturiano [62]

Answer:

The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.

Explanation:

Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.

Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.

Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.

Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.

Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).

However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.

4 0

3 years ago